Nice shoe in appearance. Very light when stepping and it promises what it gives you, but for long-term use and for those who run for endurance it is not so good, at least at the back on the heel even if you take care of it, without a protector and without much use it will start to tear. For its price, it should have better durability, especially for the brand.

The shoe is very beautiful and the color is perfect. It is not for running. But for walking, it is flawless and indeed at €90.

Bad shoes, not worth their money. I was a fan of under armour but after these shoes, never again. Broke in 3 months...

Last time UA is very hard to run, at first I thought it was imitation! For simple walking it's ok

The shoe is very beautiful and the color is perfect. It is not for running. But for walking it is excellent and even at 60 euros.

I bought them because I was completely satisfied with the clone 2. Little did I imagine that they would compromise the quality so much. The sole is very hard and they become tiring after the first kilometer. So if you want running shoes, go for the clone 2, which are clearly superior. I regret spending the money.

Bought it for 75 euros, it's not even worth 50. It's on the same level as the Machina 3, meaning it's hard, inflexible, and heavy. The series used to be one of the company's good ones, but they really lowered the bar. It has elastic fabric that tightens the foot too much. The mold is very narrow, so to fit well and comfortably, you need a size bigger than what you normally wear. What I don't understand is why, if they developed the new model, they didn't make it better and why they don't test the old and new models simultaneously when they complete the new one. The Machina 2 is significantly better than the 3. The sole is made of a material that is very hard, inflexible, and heavy. It tired me out a lot when running until I got used to it.